AIDT 스크린 리딩에 대한 문해력관련 논문을 찾아보다가...

AIDT
스크린 리딩에 대한 문해력관련 논문을 찾아보다가...

1.
아마존 킨들과 종이책을 읽는 것에 대한 차이에서
However, on measures related to chronology and temporality, those who had read in the print pocket book, performed better than those who had read on a Kindle.
이 주요 시사점으로 나오는 것 같다.

Results showed that on most tests subjects performed identically whatever the reading medium. However, on measures related to chronology and temporality, those who had read in the print pocket book, performed better than those who had read on a Kindle. It is concluded that, basically comprehension was similar with both media, but, because kinesthetic feedback is less informative with a Kindle, readers were not as efficient to locate events in the space of the text and hence in the temporality of the story. We suggest that, to get a correct spatial representation of the text and consequently a coherent temporal organization of the story, readers would be reliant on the sensorimotor cues which are afforded by the manipulation of the book.

출처 : Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?

2.
제목 : Reading on Paper Versus Screens: What’s the Difference?

1) In 2016, Singer Trakhman examined undergraduates’ reading comprehension after they read digital and print versions of articles. Format didn’t affect their grasp of the main idea, but students missed details when reading on screens.

2) Both scientists agree digital is fine to scan news headings for main ideas, but longer, complicated texts are best read in print, especially to retain the details.

간단한 글에 대해서는 차이가 없으나,
길고 복잡한 글에 대해서는 종이책이 좋다는 결과.

출처 : https://www.brainfacts.org/neuroscience-in-society/tech-and-the-brain/2020/reading-on-paper-versus-screens-whats-the-difference-072820